Web3 Security Firm's Blunder Exposes $50M Exploit Victims to Wallet Drainer

A web3 security firm's mistake has exposed victims of a $50 million exploit to further risks, highlighting vulnerabilities in the crypto space.

Victims of the recent $50 million exploit on DeFi lender Radiant Capital faced additional risks when a web3 security firm mistakenly directed them to a wallet drainer. This incident highlights the vulnerabilities in the crypto space and the need for heightened security awareness among users.

Key Takeaways

  • A web3 security firm, Ancilia, mistakenly shared a link to a wallet drainer while trying to assist victims of a $50 million exploit.
  • The exploit involved the compromise of Radiant Capital’s smart contracts on BNB Chain and Arbitrum.
  • Scammers impersonated Radiant Capital on social media, tricking users into visiting malicious sites.
  • Ancilia has since apologized and removed the misleading post.

The Incident Unfolds

On October 16, Ancilia reported a significant exploit affecting Radiant Capital, where attackers exploited the ‘transferFrom’ function in the smart contracts, leading to the loss of over $50 million in assets, including USDC, WBNB, and ETH. Following the breach, Radiant Capital advised users to revoke all approvals using Revoke.cash, a tool designed to disconnect wallets from potentially harmful smart contracts.

However, the situation worsened when Ancilia inadvertently shared a link to a fraudulent X account that mimicked Radiant Capital. This account was designed to deceive users into visiting a malicious site aimed at draining their assets through approval phishing.

The Role of Scammers

Crypto scammers quickly capitalized on the chaos, impersonating Radiant Capital on social media platforms. They created fake links that appeared to lead to the legitimate Revoke.cash platform. Ancilia, not recognizing the scam, directed users to this fraudulent post, which could have resulted in significant financial losses for unsuspecting victims.

The scammers modified the account name and handle slightly, making it easy for users to overlook the differences. For instance, they changed “Radiant Capital” to “Radiarnt Capital” and “@RDNTCapital” to “@RDNTCapitail.” Such subtle alterations can easily mislead users, especially in the fast-paced crypto environment.

Community Response

The crypto community quickly identified Ancilia’s mistake, criticizing the firm for its negligence. Users expressed their frustration over the incident, emphasizing the importance of vigilance in the crypto space. In response to the backlash, Ancilia deleted the misleading post and issued an apology, redirecting users to the official Radiant Capital account.

The Bigger Picture

This incident underscores the growing threat of impersonation scams in the cryptocurrency sector. Cybersecurity experts have noted that over 80% of comments under major crypto project posts are scams. Reports indicate that scammers frequently use similar tactics to lure victims, resulting in millions of dollars in losses.

Earlier this year, Radiant Capital was also targeted in a flash loan attack, where hackers stole $4.5 million. This pattern of repeated attacks highlights the need for enhanced security measures and user education in the crypto ecosystem.

Conclusion

As the crypto landscape continues to evolve, incidents like these serve as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities that exist. Users must remain vigilant and verify the authenticity of links and accounts before taking any action. The responsibility lies not only with security firms but also with individual users to protect their assets in an increasingly complex digital environment.

Sources

[ newsletter ]
Stay ahead of Web3 threats—subscribe to our newsletter for the latest in blockchain security insights and updates.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong. Please try again.

[ More Posts ]

Risk Scoring API Docs: Endpoints and Examples
14.11.2025
[ Featured ]

Risk Scoring API Docs: Endpoints and Examples

Explore risk scoring API docs, endpoints, and examples. Learn about risk factors, trust scores, and advanced security features for robust API security.
Read article
API for Wallet Risk: Score and Explain
14.11.2025
[ Featured ]

API for Wallet Risk: Score and Explain

Explore the API for Wallet Risk: score and explain wallet risk with AI-powered insights, continuous monitoring, and real-time security.
Read article
Joint RWA.io and Veritas Protocol Report Maps Security Response to 143% Loss Spike in Tokenized Assets
4.11.2025
[ Featured ]

Joint RWA.io and Veritas Protocol Report Maps Security Response to 143% Loss Spike in Tokenized Assets

A joint report by RWA.io and Veritas Protocol, with contributions from Tron DAO, identifies a sharp increase in security threats to the tokenized real-world asset (RWA) market.
Read article